Breaking News

You must read the 2019 ‘Absolute Zero’ report, authored by Imperial College London – once you do, you’ll realise the past 16 months have been part of a much more sinister agenda that has only just begun.

A report produced by Oxford University and Imperial College London for the UK Government reveals that all airports will be ordered to close, eating beef and lamb will be made illegal, and construction of new buildings will not be permitted in order to meet the legal commitment of zero emissions by 2050.

The report states that all airports must close between 2020 and 2029 excluding Heathrow, Glasgow and Belfast airports, which can only stay open on the condition that transfers to and from the airport are done via rail.

All remaining airports must then close between 2030 and 2049 as to meet the legal commitment of zero emissions by 2050 every citizen of the United Kingdom must “stop using aeroplanes” for a significant period of time.

In addition, the report states that to obey the law of the Climate Change Act the public will be required to stop doing anything that causes emissions regardless of its energy source. According to the report this will require the public to never eat beef or lamb ever again.

To do this national consumption of beef and lamb will drop by 50% between 2020 and 2029. Then between 2030 and 2049 beef and lamb will be “phased out”.

The report also confirms that construction of new building must cease by 2050 –

The underlying point is that any asset which uses carbon will have essentially zero value in 2050. This in turn may encourage greater use in the run up to 2050 – for example, putting up new buildings at a much faster rate for the next 30 years, knowing that construction must then halt.

The report was released in November 2019 and was authored by ‘UK Fires’, a collaboration between the Universities of Cambridge, Oxford, Nottingham, Bath and Imperial College London – the home of Professor Neil Ferguson.

Entitled ‘Absolute Zero’, the report is a research collaboration in which the authors reveal what the UK must do to meet it’s legal requirement to reach net zero emissions by 2050, and it makes for harrowing reading.

However, the timeline of events may speed up significantly because the Government enshrined a new target in law in April 2021 to slash emissions by 78% by the year 2035.

The authors of the report state the key messages are as follows –

In addition to reducing our energy demand, delivering zero emissions with today’s technologies requires the phasing out of flying, shipping, lamb and beef, blast-furnace steel and cement.

They also state this on jobs and location –

There are two key implications for how we live our lives: first, buildings will become much more expensive because the restrictions on building which generate substantial scarcities; second, transport will become much more expensive because the limits on air travel will generate excess demand for other forms of transport.

Those who are starting secondary school now, in 2019, will be 43 in 2050. Thinking about what education is appropriate for a very different set of industries is a key question. Should we still be training airplane pilots? Or aeronautical engineers?

And they state this on implementation of the requirements –

The changes in behaviour to achieve Absolute Zero are clearly substantial. In principle, these changes could be induced through changing prices and thus providing clear incentives for behaviour to change. The alternative is that the government prohibits certain types of behaviour and regulates on production processes.

You may be wondering how on earth they are going to get the support of the public in shutting the airports and stopping the consumption of beef and lamb?

Well, we could argue they are already well on their way to ensuring the closure of many airports thanks to the draconian laws that the British people have been living under since March 2020 in the name of protecting the NHS and saving lives.

Is it just a coincidence that four months after the release of the report, the UK Government brought in the coronavirus act and implemented a national lockdown which has decimated the travel industry? A quick read through the report certainly suggests the real reason for lockdown may have been so that the Government can meet its legal commitment to reduce emissions.

They will get the support just as they got the support for implementing ridiculous, draconian laws under the guise of stopping the spread of Covid-19. Laws which have decimated small business, taken away our freedoms, and created what will be the greatest health crisis to have ever been due to turning the NHS into the National Covid Service and then the National Vaccination Service.

They managed all the above through psychological manipulation and coercion. That is not an opinion, it is fact, and it is all documented in official UK Government documents which you can read here, and here. .

And they are going to use the exact same tactics to ensure you allow all airports to close and never eat beef or lamb again, this is what the ‘Absolute Zero’ report recommends the UK Government implements to achieve their legally required targets –

Buy us a coffee!

Social norms and individual behaviours

There is a misalignment between the scale of actions recommended by government (e.g. energy conservation) and those most commonly performed by individuals (e.g. recycling). Actions which can have a big effect, such as better insulation in houses and not flying, are being ignored in favour of small, high profile actions, such as not using plastic straws. This is enabling individuals to feel satisfied that they are ‘doing their bit’ without actually making the lifestyle changes required to meet the zero emissions target. If large scale social change is to be successful a new approach is needed.

Whilst the thought of society taking radical, meaningful steps to meet zero emission targets could be criticised for being idealistic, we can learn from historical cultural changes. Not long ago, smoking cigarettes was encouraged and considered to be acceptable in public spaces that children frequented, drink-driving was practiced with such regularity that it killed 1000 people per year in the UK, and discrimination based on sexual orientation was written into law. These behaviours now seem reprehensible, showing society is capable acknowledging the negative consequences of certain behaviours and socially outlawing their practice. Focus should therefore be centred on expediting the evolution of new social norms with confidence that change can happen.

Evidence from behavioural science, and the long experience in public health of changing behaviours around smoking and alcohol, shows that information alone is not enough to change behaviour. To make the types of changes described in this report, we will have to think more broadly on the economic and physical contexts in which designers, engineers and members of the public make decisions that determine carbon emissions.

At the same time, clear, accurate and transparent information on problems and the efficacy of proposed solutions is essential for maintaining public support for policy interventions. The phrasing of communication is also important. Messages framed about fear and climate crisis have been found to be ineffective at motivating change.

The longevity of the challenge of reducing emissions, and the lack of immediate or even apparent consequences of small individual actions mean it is challenging to link to them to the large-scale climate crisis. This allows individuals to make decisions which contrast with their desire to reduce emissions.

Scientific description is not always the most effective means of communication, and language used to promote zero emissions should no longer focus on an ‘ecofriendly’ and ‘green’ lexicon, but rather candid descriptions of actions that appeal to human fulfilment. Evidence from time-use studies shows that human fulfilment does not strictly depend on using energy – the activities we enjoy the most are the ones with the lowest energy requirements.

Consumers can be satisfied in a zero emissions landscape.

Buy us a coffee!

But they will also get the support they need by conditioning and indoctrinating your children in schools –

‘Starting with the difficult decisions, an educational setting should provide a timeline for actions to be taken by humanity in order to ensure that we hit our carbon reduction targets by 2050. By working backwards from 2050, and sequentially working out the order and timing in which key mitigation actions need to be taken, a roadmap for the necessary restraint can be established.

Across the secondary school system, this roadmap is essential in eliciting the questions which will inevitably come from the school children. This will enable an exploration of real change in the mind sets of those who will need to embrace change more than ever before later in their lives.

Huge questions will emerge, such as: will internal-combustion engines disappear, will aeroplanes disappear, will meat and-dairy agriculture disappear, and will we need to stop building things? By empowering school children to realise that asking the huge questions is appropriate, we will enable change to be embraced through education.

All of this will be done to allegedly reduce carbon emissions due to the alleged danger of global warming.

The average carbon footprint per person in the UK, per year, is 12.7 tonnes CO2e.

  1. Your heating would need to be going full blast for 80 days straight to to produce 12.7 tonne CO2e.
  2. You would need to drive 23,000 miles in the average car to emit 12.7 tonnes of CO2e (that’s once around the world).
  3. You’d have to eat over 1,000 beef steaks to produce 12.7 tonnes CO2e.

In terms of global annual carbon emissions of ca. 38,000 megatonnes CO2e, 12.7 tonnes doesn’t sound like much. But when you consider a population of 68 million people in the UK alone, nearing 8 billion worldwide, all of a sudden it sounds like in order to meet a target which is enshrined in UK law and must be legally met, it may just be easier to reduce the population of the United Kingdom?

The past sixteen months have seen –

You must read the ‘Absolute Zero’ report, authored by Oxford University and Imperial College London, the former having invented the AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine, and the latter being instrumental in providing flawed models that were used to justify draconian lockdowns in both the UK and USA.

Because once you do, you will realise that the past sixteen months have been part of a much more sinister agenda that has only just begun.

We urgently need your help!
Support for our Fundraiser has fallen

dramatically due to censorship by Google
and Social Media. If you like what we do
then please help us to keep doing it
by supporting us today…

Please choose your preferred donation method

They’re coming for the children – JCVI recommends children are given the Covid-19 Jab despite the fact it is killing Children in the USA
The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) has recommended all children …
A letter to the Unvaccinated
Ontario Civil Liberties Association researcher Dr. Denis Rancourt and several fellow Canadian …
New York City Requires Covid Vaccine Passports for Guests To Enter Restaurants and Gyms
Mayor Bill de Blasio announced on Tuesday that New Yorkers will be …
Senior UK Lawyer discusses serving notices of liability on vaccinators and potential criminal trials for Crimes against Humanity
Anna de Buisseret is a senior UK lawyer and a retired Army …
First Autopsy of Dead Person Vaccinated for Covid Found to Contain Spike Proteins in Every Organ of Body
Researchers discovered that the now-deceased vaccinated patient's body was riddled with spike …
Investigation – UK Gov. / SAGE document admits the Covid-19 Vaccines will lead to a variant that kills 35% of people because the jabs do not prevent infection or transmission
A document produced by the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies advising the …
Contract Approved to Use TOXIC Graphene Oxide for Water Treatment in UK – The Same Substance Found in Covid-19 Vaccines
G2O Water Technologies, a UK technology business, has managed to get its …
UK Government Bribing Young People to Get Covid Vaccine Through Free Pizza and Taxi Rides
The UK government is hoping that free food and taxi rides will …
Germany’s Largest Newspaper BILD Apologises for Harming Society Over its Coverage of the Covid-19 Pandemic
Germany's largest newspaper BILD has apologised for their coverage of the Covid-19 …
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

[…] ByClifford James July 8, 2021July 8, 2021 You must read the 2019 ‘Absolute Zero’ report, authored by Imperial College London – once … […]


Apparently Whitty said this at Christmas 2019

“2020 is also a year of global opportunities and a positive challenge is to build on the remarkable recent progress in stopping vaccine-preventable diseases. Gavi replenishment – financing for vaccines in the world’s poorest countries – led by the UK will help stimulate continued innovation and make the case for vaccines. The climate change conference COP26 in the UK will also be a very important event for all government departments – climate change remains the greatest long-term threat if it is not tackled.”

Hidden in plain sight eh?

Last edited 26 days ago by Noddy

Read thr reports from 2016 already knew .Efficiency I think is if the essence in remedying the errancies inherent in English Imperialism.

Richard Noakes

I think we are all missing the point here: What do mRNA vaccines do, which they are not telling us about, for the mRNA vaccine makers to have blanket immunity from prosecution, while being allowed to receive payments for their mRNA vaccines?

So the mRNA vaccines work at holding Covid at bay, for the time being, which justifies them to some degree, if you wait until you have Covid in your body, before it is dealt with, unlike as I propose with my free salt water cure – kill Coronavirus in the head, before it ever gets to be Covid in the body, afterwards.

But what we do know “now”, is that mRNA vaccines go from the injection point around the total body in 4 hours and into the organs, with larger amounts recorded in the Testes of men and Ovaries of women and all of the organs of the body, except the Liver and it has been reported that over 80 women who were pregnant lost their babies, after being given mRNA vaccines.

It seems to me that a desirable reduction in world human population by 10% has been achieved from those who died within 14 days after having mRNA vaccines and many more, who should have died, but who did not, left with severe after effects which will eventually kill them, anyway.

So what if mRNA vaccines are “chemical castration” over both sexes and once the mRNA vaccines are in, they can’t be taken out and one jab is enough to get the job done, but two confirms it?

A natural reduction in people numbers by mRNA vaccines, will reduce numbers down to much more manageable figures and those who have been chemically castrated, won’t be able to have kids, so it is inevitable that the people populations on this planet will be reduced down to 50 million or less, by natural processes rather than forced procedures, with no malice intended towards anyone.

I imagine that anyone who has had mRNA vaccines, who manage to get pregnant, will lose their kid anyway, before birthing, because of the mRNA particles in their body, which will prevent that.

The mRNA vaccine makers are not legally responsible for anything, you are, whatever the outcomes of the mRNA vaccines in your body, which you have agreed to be put there, so to all intents and purposes, you agreed to whatever else the mRNA vaccines do in your body, whether you like it or not. Simple.

With regards to meat, well, I don’t really like the idea of slaughterhouses and what they do, even if I like the package meat cuts at supermarkets, often at prices outside my income capability, so if Bill Gates can produce manufactured meat with all of the vitamins and elements we need in our food to live comfortably and well, then I am all for his alternative meat production, which does not take animal life, to extend human life – bring it on Bill – at a cost all of us can afford!!

So with chemical castration, a huge cut back of kids being born, furnished houses for all, just move in and take over from where those who died previously, along with their cars and everything else left off, fake meat – with a huge reduction in animal husbandry – what more could we ask for in the foreseeable future – and we can f*ck like rabbits without contraceptives, because nothing is going to happen anyway – Valhalla!! – and work until your 70’s and drop dead, irrespective of sex, when a new young person is prepped ready to go, made by lab birthing techniques without parents being necessary, available now, to replace you and thank you for your services, it sounds like Orwellian paradise to me!!

More room for everyone. The planet ceases to heat up from overpopulation, resources are reduced significantly because the demand for them will pretty much cease, computers and robots will do most of the menial tasks, including electric robot trucks and cars and our planet will return to an earthly paradise with a lot less of our species on it and for ever.



Pfizer macht frei…if you wanna die.
Same as it ever waZ

Onward to the all new Ouch Witz…where the joke is on the sheeple.


While I don’t agree with much of your perspective, I very much appreciate the sardonic humor bordering on optimism. Good for you.


The whole thing is a farce. Biggest mistake in human history. CO2 is a critical atmospheric gas and not a greenhouse gas. The Sun drives the Earth’s climate/temperature and the future is cold with a few big solar flares thrown it.


Graeten Thunfisch Syndrome, the darling waif of the watermelon socialist morons (green outside and red through and through), where abused retards and one trick gimps determine the future of humanity can only be entertained for so long before the politcal whores, presstitutes and Davos filth are finally strung up and dispatched to the bowels of hell. The longer the herd carries on humoring this nonsense the more blood there will be before it ends.

This coming winter will decide the fate of humanity not to mention the ovine herd of numbskulls already too late to turn back from their “safe” slaughterhouse..

There is but one solution for terrorists and their willing helpers!

Michael Sterling

No need to worry. When we have the next Carrington Event (next 20-30 years), everything electrical will be gone.


Meanwhile as we in the “western” world bend ourselves into pretzels and ruin our lives this: