Breaking News

CDC manipulated study data to show the Covid-19 Vaccines are safe for Pregnant Women when in reality 4 in 5 suffered a miscarriage

Data has been manipulated by scientists carrying out a real-world study for the CDC to show that the Covid-19 vaccines are safe for use during pregnancy, however an analysis of the actual findings shows that 4 out of 5 pregnant women vaccinated suffered a miscarriage.  

The study entitled ‘Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons, has been published on the New England Journal of Medicine. From December 14, 2020, to February 28, 2021, data from the “v-safe after vaccination health checker” surveillance system, the v-safe pregnancy registry, and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) was used to characterise the initial safety of mRNA Covid-19 vaccines in pregnant persons.

The authors conclusion of the study is as follows –

‘Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. However, more longitudinal follow-up, including follow-up of large numbers of women vaccinated earlier in pregnancy, is necessary to inform maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes.’

The authors of the study, which include the ‘CDC v-safe COVID-19 Pregnancy Registry Team’ were able to conclude this due to way they presented their findings which were as follows –

‘Among 827 participants who had a completed pregnancy, the pregnancy resulted in a live birth in 712 (86.1%), in a spontaneous abortion in 104 (12.6%), in stillbirth in 1 (0.1%), and in other outcomes (induced abortion and ectopic pregnancy) in 10 (1.2%).’

The authors of the study also made the following claim based on the above numbers –

Although not directly comparable, calculated proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in persons vaccinated against Covid-19 who had a completed pregnancy were similar to incidences reported in studies involving pregnant women that were conducted before the Covid-19 pandemic.

However, when reading the small print of table 4, in which they claim just 104 / 12.6% of 827 completed pregnancies resulted in miscarriage (spontaneous abortion), we can see that the numbers they have presented are extremely misleading.

This is because of the 827 completed pregnancies, 700 / 86% of the women had received a dose of either the Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccine during the third trimester of pregnancy. The third trimester of pregnancy is from week 27 – 40, and it is therefore impossible to suffer a miscarriage due to the fact they are considered as occurring prior to week 20 of a pregnancy.

This means just 127 women received either the Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccine during the first / second trimester, with 104 of the woman sadly losing their baby.

Therefore the rate of incidence of miscarriage is 82%, not 12.6% as presented in the findings of the study.

It is impossible for anyone vaccinated during the third trimester to suffer a miscarriage in respect of the parameters set in the study. A pregnancy loss in this case would be considered a still birth, occurring after week 20 of pregnancy.

The authors of this study have manipulated the data to show that the Covid-19 vaccines are safe for use during pregnancy. The actual findings show that they are far from it. Their actions are now having dire consequences for women throughout the United Kingdom.

As of the 23rd June 2021 a total of 289 women have reported the loss of their baby due to the Covid-19 vaccines. However, the actual number could be eye-wateringly higher due to only 1% – 10% of adverse reactions being reported to the scheme.

153 reports of miscarriage, 1 report of a premature baby sadly dying, 5 reports of foetal death, and 4 reports of stillbirth have been reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine.

113 reports of miscarriage, 1 report of foetal death, and 2 reports of stillbirth have been reported as adverse reactions to the AstraZeneca vaccine.

7 reports of miscarriage have been reported as adverse reactions to the recently emergency approved Moderna vaccine.

If this isn’t a blatant crime against humanity, then we don’t know what is.


We urgently need your help!
Support for our Fundraiser has fallen

dramatically due to censorship by Google
and Social Media. If you like what we do
then please help us to keep doing it
by supporting us today…

Please choose your preferred donation method


Calls for an Ambulance due to Cardiac Arrest and Unconsciousness have skyrocketed since young adults started getting the Covid-19 Vaccine
Data published by Public Health England shows that calls to the ambulance …
The impending war on Home Ownership
The incipient “Great Reset” is a multi-faceted beast. We talk a lot …
Murder in the Care Home – The pandemic response 4 years in the planning
Official documents that were meant to be kept secret have been released …
German Politician Says Vaccinated People Will “Definitely” Have More Freedom Than Unvaccinated People
Helge Braun, chief of staff of Chancellor Angela Merkel, said on Sunday …
American Medical Association Calls for MANDATORY Covid Vaccines for ALL Healthcare Workers
The AMA has joined with a slew of other big pharma groups …
Expert Gynaecologist says Covid-19 vaccinated individuals may affect unvaccinated women
Doctor Shelley Cole, a board-certified Obstetrician -Gynaecologist has expressed her concern over …
Philippines President tells public who refuse vaccine that “For all I care you can die anytime” and bans them from leaving their home
Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte has told the public that if they have …
EXCLUSIVE – Covid-19 deaths are rising and official data shows 87% of the people who have died were Vaccinated
Alleged Covid-19 deaths are on the rise again in the United Kingdom, …
Dr Robert Malone: “The Covid-19 Vaccine Causes the Virus to Become More Infectious”
Dr Robet Malone said that if the data revealed by NBC News …
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
41 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Krofter

The Pfizer vaxx causes more than 5 times as many birth defects as Moderna or J&J. There is also evidence that Moderna and J&J overall numbers are being manipulated downward while Pfizer’s go up. Intercorporate warfare? https://secularheretic.substack.com/p/death-by-covid-vaccine-update-10

Sorcha

Exactly what many of us have been saying from the start. Rothschild and his shekel scamming sidekicks (all US presidents bar 1 have been related to the fraud royals and are at the root of the evil as always)

The fraud royal “so called Jews” pimping the genocide with cousin “so called Jewish” cousin Rothschild, as is always the case with this bunch of country/world digesting maggots.

The transparent stunt sending Kate Middleton into isolation was a vey limp attempt at them trying to make out “they are one of us” and to keep the killer BS they are part of flowing.

Her cousin-husband William unfortunately is still rearing his ugly traitorous head in public (Perhaps Kate’s got a head ache due to ritual incest?)

Chris Whitty calling for more lockdowns whilst at the same time saying “we’re going to have to live with the virus like it’s the flu” from the other side of his face. The absolute outpouring of hatred for that cretin this morning will have his chameleon-like eyes swivelling at top speed.

His qualifications aren’t worth the paper they are written on. The only reason he was placed in a job he’s clearly totally unfit for (unless his job title is deranged mass murdering “so called Jewish” psychopath), was only put there because his father was killed in Palestine by a Palestinian doing the dirty work for Israel and fake Jew infested government UK and fraudulent royals.

He never committed trespass ever again. Now we have his traitorous psycho son trespassing against us instead for the sae masters

Paul Chaney

…Much Gratitude to All at Daily Expose – Keep Spreading The TRUTH-The LOVE…I shall continue to support in whatever way that I can, Namaste ❤️

Erik Schund

I think you misunderstand the data. Any number of the spontaneous abortions could be from the women who were unvaccinated at +w20 as the ‘normal’ rate of spontaneounabortions is about 15%.

Nothing in the document explicitly or implicitly says that all SA were with the early vaccinated women.

scowie

The study includes only women vaccinated whilst pregnant. It does not include women who had a spontaneous abortion then had a vaccine some weeks later.

Sorcha

Have you looked at the vaers website? It shows stats for miscarriages in vaccinated women?

Ben Cohen

If you actually read the paper the 827 women mentioned relate to “completed pregnancies” only. Completed meaning just that: women who have given birth, SA, miscarriages and so on. The 82% calculation is erroneous simply because there are still many women vaccinated in their first and second trimesters who have yet to complete their pregnancies.

That spontaneous abortion line in table 4 of the paper is misleading, and somewhat irrelevant.

That stated this paper concludes:

“Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. However, more longitudinal follow-up, including follow-up of large numbers of women vaccinated earlier in pregnancy, is necessary to inform maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes.”

At this point in time there are no “obvious safety signals” however the conclusion has qualifications regarding women vaccinated in early pregnancy. Also one must consider that the neo-natal outcomes for those women who have given birth are at this point in time incomplete because possible neurological problems and other may not be observable for some years yet.

It is also interesting that this paper appears to be the one and only paper that the Heath Departments of the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and The United Stated (at least) use to assure women that the vaccine is safe to have during ALL stages of pregnancies – without qualification.

Such a claim based on this incomplete minimal preliminary research is misleading and reckless indeed. It could be argued that it appears safe to be vaccinated during the third trimester however once again it is early days yet regarding neo-natal outcomes and neurological development of the babies.

Dennis

Thank you so much for a reasoned analysis!

Annonymous

Its the usual, more research Grant’s will be needed As yet our research is inconclusive ,or if conclusive then contradicted by another group just as conclusively Its always the same Could be this ,maybe that ,possibly something else Who knows Cant say More Grant’s needed Always

Dennis

The 12% number is, as you correctly point out, deeply flawed, as it includes many women past the first trimester.
The 82% number, however is also deeply flawed. It excludes women who were still pregnant at the time of the study, which was the vast majority of women who got the shot in the first trimester .

Sarah Ruddach

700 of the 827 participants got their vaccine in the third trimester. That only leaves 127 that had their vaccine in the first or second trimester. Please help we understand the numbers, because I really don’t want to manipulate data… but if you look at the success rate of having the vaccine in either your first or second trimester it looks really bad. This study classifies miscarriages as happening before 20 weeks, and since the third trimester starts at 27 weeks, none of the people vaccinated in the third trimester (all 700 participants) would even qualify for a miscarriage. I think the article is correct with its %, you just need to realize that the 82% chance of a miscarriage is relevant to getting the vaccine in either the first or second trimester of your pregnancy (which is when miscarriage can happen). If I’m missing something please let me know, as I do not want to spread incorrect info.

Dennis

I appreciate your desire for truth, and will try to help you see the problem.
If you look at the study, over 1000 women in their first trimester had the vaccine. The 127 number is women who had a “completed pregnancy” after having the vaccine in the first trimester. “Completed” means it’s over, the woman is no longer pregnant. Since the study was only over 10 weeks, most of those 1000 women did not complete their pregnancy, and of course the ones that did are nearly all from miscarriage.

[…] ByClifford James July 6, 2021July 6, 2021 CDC manipulated study data to show the Covid-19 Vaccines are safe for Pregnant Women when in reality… […]

Annonymous

Money talks Sciences receive hundreds 8f billions every year in ” Grant’s ” from big business The truth is sold .Every study will produce a contradictory conclusion or a contradictory other study That’s how they work it

[…] Read More: CDC manipulated study data to show the Covid-19 Vaccines are safe for Pregnant Women when… […]

Caleb Kerby

The TOTAL amount of participants who were vaccinated in the first trimester were 1714, meaning that 104 miscarriages results in a 6 percent rate of miscarriage, assuming that none of the preconception vaccinations resulted in miscarriages. Table 4 only talks about completed pregnancies, which means that the vast majority of vaccinated peoples were still pregnant at the time that the study was written

Sorcha

Pregnant women in India are not allowed to have COVID vaccines. Pressure is being put on the Government to start injecting them with this poison.

The Indian government felt the full force of Indian doctors against Gates killer vaccines before, hopefully they won’t relent for the money.

[…] Read More: CDC manipulated study data to show the Covid-19 Vaccines are safe for Pregnant Women when… […]

[…] Covid-19 Vaccines are safe for Pregnant Women when in reality 4 in 5 suffered a miscarriage – https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/07/06/cdc-manipulated-study-data-to-show-the-covid-19-vaccines-are-sa… – “Data has been manipulated by scientists carrying out a real-world study for the CDC […]

Sorcha

 the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) inadvertently revealed that as many as 82 percent of pregnant women who get “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) end up suffering a miscarriage. Entitled, “Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons,”STUDY: 82% of pregnant women who got vaccinated for covid during first and second trimesters suffered miscarriage

://www.afinalwarning.com/532324.html

Dennis

You make every vaccine reluctant person look like idiots by promoting this obviously flawed conclusion. Are you paid directly by Pfizer or through an intermediary?

Darren

127 does not refer to the total number of pregnancies with mothers that received a vaccination before the end of the 3rd trimester. It refers to the number of pregnancies with mothers that received a vaccination before the end of the 3rd trimester WHERE THE PREGNANCY WAS CONCLUDED WHEN THE FOLLOW-UP WAS DONE.

 Because 827 covers the pregnancies that were concluded when they did the follow up. As I say, they covered people vaccinated between mid-December and the end of February and followed up at the end of March. In other words, people would have been followed up 1 to 3.5 months after receiving their vaccine. This means that not many women who were before the third trimester when they received the vaccination would have concluded their pregnancy when followed up: a very small proportion (say those vaccinated at 6 months) would have given birth by the time they were followed up, but most women would a) have a pregnancy still underway or b) have a miscarriage.

Of those who had given birth to a living baby when followed, yes, it stands to reason that they would have already been in the 3rd trimester when vaccinated, because if a normal pregnancy lasts 9 months, then contacting women 1 to 3.5 months after they have received a vaccine who were already in the 3rd trimester, they will account for the vast majority of women who had already given birth when they were followed up.

Josef

Class-Action lawsuit needs to happen. The CDC (see deceit) is NOT a government body.

[…] blood clots; strokes; myocarditis, and multisystem inflammatory syndrome. In the meantime, a current examine printed within the New England Journal of Medication exhibits simply how devastating this stuff […]

[…] Syndrome; blood clots; strokes; myocarditis, and multisystem inflammatory syndrome. Meanwhile, a recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine shows just how devastating these things can be for […]

[…] Syndrome; blood clots; strokes; myocarditis, and multisystem inflammatory syndrome. Meanwhile, a recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine shows just how devastating these things can be for […]

[…] blood clots; strokes; myocarditis, and multisystem inflammatory syndrome. In the meantime, a latest research revealed within the New England Journal of Drugs exhibits simply how devastating this stuff could […]

[…] Syndrome; blood clots; strokes; myocarditis, and multisystem inflammatory syndrome. Meanwhile, a recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine shows just how devastating these things can be for […]

[…] Syndrome; blood clots; strokes; myocarditis, and multisystem inflammatory syndrome. Meanwhile, a recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine shows just how devastating these things can be for […]

[…] blood clots; strokes; myocarditis, and multisystem inflammatory syndrome. In the meantime, a recent study printed within the New England Journal of Drugs exhibits simply how devastating these items will be […]

[…] Syndrome; blood clots; strokes; myocarditis, and multisystem inflammatory syndrome. Meanwhile, a recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine shows just how devastating these things can be for […]

Anonymous

GUYS you are wrong. Of course that among vaccinated women, 100% of those who “complete their pregnancy” within 20 weeks have had miscarriage. 100% yes. Because if they completed their pregnancy in the first 20 weeks it means they had a miscarriage.

In this case it is 82% because some of them had received ther jab early last year and had their baby early before 9 months. But other than that, the 82% could as well be 100% it would be perfectly normal.

Last edited 15 days ago by Anonymous
Bretigne

I think you are misunderstanding where the 82% comes from. It does not represent the number of women who “completed their pregnancy” within 20 weeks – it represents the number of women who *were vaccinated* in the first 20 weeks, and then suffered a miscarriage.

See: “This means just 127 women received either the Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccine during the first / second trimester, with 104 of the woman sadly losing their baby.

[…] Syndrome; blood clots; strokes; myocarditis, and multisystem inflammatory syndrome. Meanwhile, a recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine shows just how devastating these things can be for […]

[…] The CDC had presented the results of the study to show that just 12.6% of women had suffered a miscarriage after having the Covid-19 jab. However, when reading the small print, we could see that the real number of women who’d suffered a miscarriage was 82%. […]

[…] Florida Urologist Finds Signs Of Infertility & Prostate Cancer In Men Jabbed With COVID Vaccines CDC manipulated study data to show the Covid-19 Vaccines are safe for Pregnant Women when in reality… […]

[…] Le CDC avait présenté les résultats de l’étude pour montrer que seulement 12,6% des femmes avaient subi une fausse couche après avoir reçu le vaccin Covid-19. Cependant, en lisant les petits caractères, nous pouvions voir que le nombre réel de femmes qui avaient subi une fausse couche était de 82 %. […]

[…] Click here to visit: CDC manipulated study data to show the Covid-19 Vaccines are safe for Pregnant Women when in reality… […]

[…] Click here to visit: CDC manipulated study data to show the Covid-19 Vaccines are safe for Pregnant Women when in reality… […]

Duria
Hi, in the Drug Test Case Series table Printed Name: COVID-19 mRNA Pfizer-Biontech Vaccine Test Print shows a date that must be wrong I guess.
Earliest Reaction Date: 13-Apr-1968 Any ideas?

[…] Can we trust the results after the CDC manipulated the last study to show they were safe when in reality 4 in 5 lost their baby?… https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/07/06/cdc-manipulate…. […]