Breaking News

NHS Doctor sends legal letter to Chief Exec of NHS England laying out unlawful actions by NHS Executives, UK Government, SAGE, and the MHRA

Solicitors have sent a letter addressed to the Chief Executive Officer of NHS England Sir Simon Stevens, on behalf of a whistleblowing NHS doctor laying out accusations of unlawful actions by NHS executives, the UK Government, Sage, the MHRA and other authorities.

The letter was also sent to Cressida Dick the Metropolitan Police chief, Charlie Massey the Chief Executive of the General Medical Council, Kathryn Stone OBE the Commissioner for Parliamentary Standards, and Lindsay Hoyle, Speaker of the House of Commons.  

Philip Hyland Solicitors who specialise in employment law, constructed the letter on behalf of Dr Sam White who was suspended by NHS England on the 26th June 2021 for publicly questioning the authorities Covid-19 protocols.

The reasons given for Dr Sam White’s suspension have allegedly been inconsistent, with the letter revealing he was told one thing verbally and another in writing.

Dr Sam White was told in writing that he was suspended on the basis of his social media output which blew the lid off everything the complying general public thought they knew about the past sixteen months.

Dr Sam White said in a social media video that gained over a million views that “the vaccine programme has been rolled out in breach of the legal requirements for clinicians to obtain the free and informed consent of those being vaccinated,” and “the requirement to wear face coverings in an NHS setting is in breach of common law obligations not to cause harm and breaches statutory obligations in relation to provision of PPE”.

Dr Sam White

The solicitors asked Sir Simon Stevens to treat the letter as “a public interest disclosure or whistle blow in that it raises allegations of alleged criminal conduct and breach of legal obligations by those leading the covid response” and is extremely condemning of the authorities which have imposed draconian restrictions and unnecessary medical treatments on the British people for the past sixteen months.

Public Hyland Solicitors described the inconsistencies of Dr Sam White’s suspension as follows –

“My client raised concerns during his NHS five year revalidation appraisal process with the NHS in November 2020. All of these concerns were raised during the revalidation appraisal process and overlap with what is in my client’s social media content. The NHS took no action on either the substance of the concerns raised in my client’s appraisal nor did the NHS take any action against my client for raising those concerns during his appraisal. My client’s appraisal was signed off by the NHS Responsible Person. The same Responsible Person who later suspended my client. The NHS appear to have acted in the way they did because my client pointed out that there are a number of elephants in the room.”

Buy us a coffee!

The accusations made within the letter to Sir Simon Stevens are damning and consist of the following –

  • The MHRA has failed to ensure the vaccine advertising programme meets common law obligations as well as statutory obligations.
  • The MHRA in granting emergency use authorisation for the Covid vaccine failed in their obligation to consider whether there are safe and effective medicines available as an alternative to vaccination.
  •  The MHRA is failing in its obligations in failing either to instruct a bio-distribution study is conducted on those who have been vaccinated or in failing to publish the findings of such a bio-distribution study.
  • Clinicians practising within the NHS are obliged to do two things when administering a vaccine: 1. To do no harm. 2. To obtain the free and informed consent of those being vaccinated. The NHS and the Government have done neither and breach of these principles on free and informed consent is professional gross misconduct at an individual level.
  • At an organisational level if the NHS does not have clear evidence that every person being vaccinated has given free and informed consent it will render those holding executive office within the NHS as legally liable for those institutional failings.
  • Those presenting the information have not publicly declared at the press conferences their financial links to the vaccine industry.
  • Many of those presenting the information to the public are associated with or employed directly or indirectly by organisations who have been financially funded by the Gates Foundation.
  • The MHRA, the UK regulatory body approving the vaccines, has itself been funded by the Gates Foundation.
  • Moderna’s share price has risen from $10 to over $200 5 in the space of eighteen months. Bill Gates and his charitable foundation are significant investors in Moderna6 , one of the companies supplying a vaccine. It should also be noted that Bill Gates has a known association with Geoffrey Epstein.
  • Matt Hancock did not declare to the public that he had a girlfriend and he did not declare that that girlfriend had financial links through her business with PPE and other contracts over which he had responsibility.
  • The public have been informed via press conferences that there was only one medical route out of the pandemic and that was via vaccination. That route is not the only available route. Quicker, cheaper and less risky routes are also available as an alternative to those who have no need or desire to be vaccinated and these routes have been known about for many months.
  • The Government and the NHS has supplied information to the public on the number of infections. That information does not differentiate between individuals testing positive without a Doctor or nurse diagnosing that individual and confirming that they are infected and or are ill with covid, and those individuals testing positive where a Doctor or nurse has diagnosed infection in that individual and has diagnosed that they are ill with covid.
  • A letter from an MP states that the tests used can test for any Winter virus. It is probable therefore that the data presented by the government as infections with coronavirus also includes individuals who have tested positive but the test has failed to distinguish what sort of virus is present and whether that virus is old or recent.
  • The cycle threshold at which the PCR test has been set is too high to give reliable data on infection.
  • The press conferences have heightened the public’s sense of the material risk as the information presented exaggerated the numbers in a material way.
  • There has been no publicity at all at the press conferences that covid is not a High Consequence Infectious Disease.
  • The numbers of hospitalisations of people with covid has been presented to the public at the press conference and then disseminated via news broadcasts. That information has not differentiated between those presenting in hospital with covid illness. those presenting in hospital with another condition who have subsequently tested positive for coronavirus, or whether those hospitalised with coronavirus have caught the infection in hospital.
  • The information presented to the public has also not set out the numbers of people who have recovered from covid.
  • The information has been presented in such a way to make the public think that the material risks are greater than they are. This has either been intentional or grossly negligent.
  • The public are unable to give proper informed consent to vaccination if the material risks have been exaggerated or distorted.
  • The information presented to the public does not differentiate between those dying from Covid, those dying from another condition but who have tested positive within 28 days of death, or those dying from another condition but who have tested positive after death.
  • The public is unable to determine what their material risk is of dying from covid as the numbers of deaths from covid have been exaggerated and are unreliable.
  • The data about risk of dying has also been confused by the fact that Do Not Resuscitate Notices have been used unilaterally without consent and the widespread use of Midazolam during the pandemic in care home settings.
  • The information that has been presented shows that the distribution of risk is uneven. Those under 75 who are healthy are unlikely to die from covid. The risk is asymmetrical. The vaccination roll out has been symmetrical.
  • The Prime Minister of the country in January 2021 described the vaccination roll out as an immunisation programme. That communication gave the public the impression that vaccines would provide immunity. The vaccine trials have been set up have as their trial design and trial protocol to reduce symptoms. The Prime Minister was at best sloppy with his language as the vaccine trial protocols was to test for efficacy of symptom reduction. It should also be noted that the vaccine protocols also refer to the use of PCR tests in the clinical trials, despite those tests’ known unreliability. None of the vaccines provide immunity. None of the vaccines stop transmission.
  • Initially the government said that only those identified as vulnerable should be vaccinated. That then changed. Mr Gates met with the PM before the change in policy, this meeting with Mr Gates was to discuss a global vaccine strategy. Initially the government said that children would not be vaccinated. That then changed. Initially government said restrictions would be released when 15 million people had been vaccinated, that then changed. Initially government said it had no plans for vaccination passports, that then changed.
  • The NHS has provided the Patient Information Leaflet to some patients who are being vaccinated. That Patient Information Leaflet does not present the material risks and the material benefits of the vaccination in an adequate way.
  • The Patient Information Leaflet does not make clear that the vaccines are still in clinical trial.
  • The Patient Information Leaflet does not make any reference to alternatives to vaccination.
  • The Patient Information Leaflet does not make clear that the mRNA vaccines are experimental in that these vaccines have never been used before and there is no data on medium term to long term safety. mRNA vaccines are described by the FDA as gene therapy.
  • The Patient Information Leaflet does not make clear that the clinical trials being run to show the safety and efficacy of the vaccine did not include particular cohorts of people including pregnant women and the very elderly. There is therefore no evidence available to show that they are safe and efficacious for those cohorts.
  • The Patient Information Leaflet does not make clear that the clinical trials are only using people who have not been infected with covid. There is therefore no data on safety and efficacy for vaccination of those who have been infected. Many people who have been infected with coronavirus are also being vaccinated.
  • . The Patient Information Leaflet does not set out the difference between the absolute risk and the relative risk from coronavirus infection.
  • By being vaccinated each individual is reducing their absolute risk of being infected and dying from covid by 1%.
  • The NHS allowed its logo on a series of adverts using celebrities to promote vaccination. It is also alleged that a number of celebrities have been paid to promote the vaccine via their social media.
  • None of the vaccines have received marketing authorisation from the MHRA. So there is a question mark as to whether an emergency use authorised vaccination should be advertised at all as there is very limited number of vaccines to choose from. Advertising of licensed medicines is strictly regulated. The Human Medicines Regulations 201227 make it a criminal offence for licensed medicines to be advertised by celebrities and any advert should notify the viewer what the active ingredient is in the vaccine if there is only one active ingredient. These adverts breach the law.
  • The NHS has taken no steps to distance itself from HM Government’s attempt to fetter every UK citizen’s right to decline any medical intervention.
  • The advertising campaign has placed pressure on people to have a vaccination. In the advertisement it is suggested that vaccination protects other members of a family including the elderly. However free and informed consent means that no one should be under any pressure from any family member to have a vaccination or indeed any medical treatment. The NHS website even states that in its section on informed consent.
  • The vaccination adverts give the impression that the vaccines have been licensed rather than the true position which is that they have been emergency use authorised which is a lower regulatory threshold than licensing.
  • The advertisements infer that the vaccines are safe. Safety is about risks. The adverts make no reference to the risk, however small, of serious adverse events.

The letter makes several other extremely serious accusations which you can read in full here.

Philip Hyland Solicitors also claim in the conclusion of the letter that they have a backlog of NHS whistle blowers to advise with exampled of pressure being placed on employees within care and NHS settings during the alleged Covid pandemic, including exaggerations of Covid bed occupancy and hospitalisation.

Dr Sam White and his solicitors are now eagerly awaiting a response from Sir Simon Stevens, Chief Executive Officer of NHS England, the MHRA, Cressida Dick, Sir Lindsay Hoyle and all other recipients of the explosive letter. The question is, will they get one?

We urgently need your help!
Support for our Fundraiser has fallen

dramatically due to censorship by Google
and Social Media. If you like what we do
then please help us to keep doing it
by supporting us today…

Please choose your preferred donation method

They’re coming for the children – JCVI recommends children are given the Covid-19 Jab despite the fact it is killing Children in the USA
The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) has recommended all children …
A letter to the Unvaccinated
Ontario Civil Liberties Association researcher Dr. Denis Rancourt and several fellow Canadian …
New York City Requires Covid Vaccine Passports for Guests To Enter Restaurants and Gyms
Mayor Bill de Blasio announced on Tuesday that New Yorkers will be …
Senior UK Lawyer discusses serving notices of liability on vaccinators and potential criminal trials for Crimes against Humanity
Anna de Buisseret is a senior UK lawyer and a retired Army …
First Autopsy of Dead Person Vaccinated for Covid Found to Contain Spike Proteins in Every Organ of Body
Researchers discovered that the now-deceased vaccinated patient's body was riddled with spike …
Investigation – UK Gov. / SAGE document admits the Covid-19 Vaccines will lead to a variant that kills 35% of people because the jabs do not prevent infection or transmission
A document produced by the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies advising the …
Contract Approved to Use TOXIC Graphene Oxide for Water Treatment in UK – The Same Substance Found in Covid-19 Vaccines
G2O Water Technologies, a UK technology business, has managed to get its …
UK Government Bribing Young People to Get Covid Vaccine Through Free Pizza and Taxi Rides
The UK government is hoping that free food and taxi rides will …
Germany’s Largest Newspaper BILD Apologises for Harming Society Over its Coverage of the Covid-19 Pandemic
Germany's largest newspaper BILD has apologised for their coverage of the Covid-19 …
5 8 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Course they all suck .The question is whether the MIC is going to revolt against the MMC Only one can be top dog and the MIC are actually ,wait for it , waking up to the fact the big pharma is stealing their power Globally Waging a war war of totalitarain global control over every government on earth

Last edited 1 month ago by Annonymous

I guess the MIC is realising that the MMC jabs will take them out.


At the end of the day that’s always been the Achilles heel and the MMC s secret weapon Theye always been able to medically murder opponents


Because theyve deceived almost everyone


And that’s why theres no sense in attempting remedy through the Courts because they know their dirty tricks and they have spouses and children and loved ones And the twin vipers know it And they dont dare even expose them .

Last edited 1 month ago by Annonymous



MIC could be Medical Industrial Complex but then that would be the same as Big Pharma making the post nonsensical, which I guess it is anyway.

My guess is this thread is some sort of disinfo with anon + nexus being the same person.

[…] ByClifford James July 3, 2021 NHS Doctor sends legal letter to Chief Exec of NHS England laying out unlawful actions by NHS Execut… […]


That’s another fine piece of evidence in support of your appeal.
Will big Dick of the Met actually do it’s job for once? Highly unlikely as it hasn’t managed to so far not once since it was promoted for giving the order to shoot the wrong man .


Thank God things are heating up a bit for the criminals. It’s a race against time as more and more idiots allow themselves to be jabbed, and refuse to see how they’re being manipulated.


It’s obvious the cult of the synagogue of satan seed have all their bent Judges in place ready to scupper all attempts to bring justice against them for this mass genocide which is 100% proven to have been making them all the richer of course.

I believe the Judges who denied Simon Dolans appeal were a “so called Jewess” and an Indian i.e the Rothschilds East India Trading Company reps, because that is who is ultimately behind all this, planting their reps in our government and legal system.

That 1 family in conjunction with the false royals is the root of so many evil treasons against us and the world (all synagogue of satan inbreeds, same as all PM’s pre selected by them for decades have been)

They must be surely considering that violence will be the only recourse the public may feel they have left if the genocide continues and the Police and armed forces continue to neglect their role of protecting us from invading mass murdering psychopaths.

Queenie has made another blunder by spewing out climate change supporting speeches and removing her mask with the other G7 control freaks when they think the camera is not on them and the after party starts. Proving themselves to be evil liars in real time has definitely helped a few people previously fooled people .


Sadly the majority seem more than happy to let Boris stick his little prick in them and inject his magic sauce just as long as they are told they will be allowed to go to the football or take a holiday.


LOL! That conjures up a hideous picture. Boris with his clothes on is grotesque enough!
Carrie is a fan of satanist Alastair Crowley so maybe that’s where she got the fetish for hooking up with something that resembles half rat half pig?
Plus the divorce settlement pay-outs from Boris are always nice and juicy.

They did the Crowley gay orgy hat tip that Chistmas when they went to the private Island of his good friend from a family well known for drug fuelled gay orgies

Now she’s working at a zoo!

Hope the animal welfare services are on high alert!

Kim Thomas

It is illegal in the UK for anyone to advertise prescribed medical interventions/pharmaceuticals directly to the consumer.


post this letter here. really needed. many


This is great news and I pray he is successful, we need justice for what has occurred. These people should not be allowed to get away with what they have done.

Today I watched a video by Dr.Richard Fleming Its quite lengthy but it contains a lot of information about this pandemic which you will find interesting. 


that link doesn’t work

Giancarlo Scagnolari

Con la scusa dell’emergenza prolungata/permanente, stanno eliminando i diritti dell’umanità. Siamo diventati merce!


Thk you for sharing this info…Just letting you know that its 3xtremely difficult to share…no luck with WhatsApp, difficult with emails….


Dr Sam White’s website has been under attack & his bank account including a savings account mysteriously had all his money mysteriously removed from them recently.
Look up: Shining a light on the real truths in the UK medical industry – with Dr Sam White on Youtube. His website is drsamwhite dot com

For those on twitter you can follow his lawyer @pjhlaw
A helpful comment on their page has flagged up another major conflict of interest the solicitor wasn’t aware of –  the Chief Executive Officer of NHS England Sir Simon Stevens is an old friend of Johnsons)

Dr Sam White on twitter @drsamuelwhite_


“Sir Simon Stevens the son of English Baptists, married to a Jewish New Yorker”
Priti Patel is married to a “so called Jew”& was caught out doing dirty deals with Israel detrimental to England. Treason.
Carrie’s special friend Sajid Javid and his non muslim wife honeymooned in Israel. He has said if he wasn’t living in England he’d live in Israel.
He’s a “friend of Israel”
As Israel only accept “so called Jewish” immigrants and Muslims are not well received in Israel, I wonder if Sajid is of mixed origins or if his non muslim wife is “so called Jewish”?


Stevens is due to step down at the end of this month


Dr Sam is a true NHS hero, just not the sort that de Pfeffel and Handjob were trying to immortalise 12 months ago.

I just hope this wakes a lot of the sheep.


The usual lack of coverage in the msn is supressing this golden nugget of truth as always.

Conservative Woman UK and Covid 19 Assembly are among the few sites reporting on this.

[…] – NHS Doctor sends legal letter to Chief Exec of NHS England laying out unlawful actions by NHS Execut… […]

Colin Furr

Another fancy name given to what is another type of common cold . A common cold which has been around for many , many years . It is NOT a killer . However , the mask wearing is . It slows air supply . Simples . The REAL killer is the VACCINATION . An illegal substance made up of many poisonous products that has not been passed as safe . Nor tested for as long as other vaccinations have been . It also contains a magnetic “chip” This is used to control us , watch us etc , etc I could go on , and on and on .

[…] The accusations in the letter to Simon Stevens are the following: […]

dawn bradley

Just goes to show that the NHS are complicit in this scam and they do not want to be exposed. Disgusting!

Fay van Dunk

Thank you for posting Dr Sam White’s letter to the Chief Executive of the NHS England. This indeed is a mighty step forward along with the many eminent physicians and scientists here in the UK and across the world, now bringing law suits against government and medical institutions that have committed malfeasance. Again thank you for your invaluable work in bringing this to the attention of the public.