Breaking News

Pfizer document confirms ‘Covid Vaccine Shedding’ leading to ‘Menstrual Cycle Disruption’ and ‘Miscarriage’ is possible via ‘skin-to-skin contact’ and ‘breathing the same air’

Hundreds if not thousands of women have reported that they have suffered irregular bleeding/clotting after receiving one of the mRNA Covid vaccines. Sadly hundreds of others have reported the loss of their unborn child. However we are now also seeing hundreds of testimonies made by women who are saying that they have lost their unborn child or suffered irregular bleeding/clotting after being in the company of others who have received one of the mRNA Covid vaccines.

Sounds unbelievable doesn’t it? Well unfortunately a Pfizer document confirms that these farfetched reports are perfectly possible.

Dr Naomi Wolf, an American author and journalist has been extremely vocal on Twitter about the subject and back on April 19th 2021 she posted a link to a Facebook page, which can be found here. The page contains hundreds of accounts from women reporting irregular bleeding after either having the Covid vaccine or being in the company of those who’ve had the Covid vaccine.

ABC7 news reporter, Kate Larsen also questioned how the Covid jabs are affecting women’s menstrual cycles on social media which received thousands of responses from concerned women –

“I had my 1st COVID-19 vaccine in January followed by the 2nd in February, and since then I have had hemorrhagic bleeding with clots. This month of April was the heaviest.”

“I thought I was going crazy, and even went as far as making a doctor’s appt and switching out my BC because mine is so heavy now and its been a month straight”

“I received the Moderna vaccine in January and February I didn’t get my period for 3 months they did multiple blood test, pregnancy test and ultrasounds but everything came back normal. Then finally on April 4 I got my period and it’s been super heavy for the past 22 days non-stop.”

We also know from the UK Governments weekly reports on adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines reported to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme that women are losing their baby after having one of the Covid jabs. The 13th report which included data inputted up to the 21st April 2021 marked a sad milestone, as the number of women reporting the loss of their baby after having one of the Covid vaccines passed the 100 mark.

With reports like this being made it is extremely interesting and concerning to find that hidden within a Pfizer document titledA PHASE 1/2/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2 RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS’ is a whole section covering the possibility of ‘mRNA vaccine shedding’ in which it is possible for those who have been in close proximity of someone who has had the Pfizer mRNA jab to suffer an adverse reaction.

In section 8.3.5 of the document it describes how exposure during pregnancy or breastfeeding to the Pfizer mRNA jab during the trials should be reported to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness. This is strange because pregnant women / new mothers were and are not part of the safety trials. So how can they be exposed?

Well Pfizer confirms that exposure during pregnancy can occur if a female is found to be pregnant and is environmentally exposed to the vaccine during pregnancy. The document states that environmental exposure during pregnancy can occur if a female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having being exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact. Or if a male family member of healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.

In layman’s terms Pfizer are admitting in this document that it is possible to expose another human being to the mRNA Covid vaccine just by breathing the same air or touching the skin of the person who has been vaccinated.

Pfizer also confirm that it is possible to expose a baby to the mRNA vaccine via breastfeeding even if the mother has not received the Pfizer jab. They state this is again possible via environmental exposure, in which the mother is found to be breastfeeding an infant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.

Pfizer also confirm in section of the document that adverse reactions may occur after ‘Occupational Exposure’. The document states occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention and says this “may or may not lead to the occurrence of an Adverse Event”.

The authorities and Fact Checkers are of course doing their best to try and sweep the thousands of testimonies from women under the carpet with several fact checking articles now out in the mainstream trying to belittle those who discuss the issue as “anti-vaxxers”. This includes Full Fact who are almost completely fully funded by Facebook.

The one thing all these fact checking sites fail to cover in their reports is that Pfizer have stated in black and white in their document that mRNA vaccine shedding is a real possibility, and they have extreme concerns about it when it comes to women and pregnancy.

We urgently need your support!
We rely solely on your support to help

fund our investigative reports.
If you like what we do then please help us to
keep doing it by supporting us today.

Please click the red button to donate via PayPal
Hate PayPal? Then please click the ‘Donate Now’ button to donate by card

The Anatomy of a Perfect Call to Action & Why they are Critical for Site Conversions - Inbound Now - November 5, 2013
Image result for donate today button
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image.png

Teenager hospitalised with dangerous blood clots on the brain after having the Pfizer COVID Vaccine
A teenager has been hospitalised after developing blood clots due to the …
COVID Vaccines risk “sterilising an entire generation of Children” according to respected Doctor
COVID 'vaccines' risk “sterilising an entire generation of children”, as well as …
Why are people going blind after having the Covid Vaccine?
Since the first Covid-19 vaccine was authorised for use in the United …
Why the British people should be fearful of the future…
The people of the United Kingdom are living in a world where …
COVID Fraud – Lawyers & Medical Experts start legal proceedings against W.H.O and World Leaders for ‘Crimes against Humanity’
A team of over 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts led …
Australian Man Dies of a Massive BLOOD CLOT Days After Receiving Covid-19 Vaccine
Source: Daily MailDarren Missen, 55, of Tamworth, Australia, tragically died days after …
Pfizer document confirms concerns of ‘Vaccine Shedding’ after thousands of women report irregular bleeding and miscarriage
Hundreds if not thousands of women have reported that they have suffered …
UK Government release 14th report on Adverse Reactions to the Covid Vaccines
The U.K. Government have released the fourteenth update highlighting adverse reactions to …
Why it would be criminal to give a child the COVID-19 Vaccine
The UK Government and Health Officials are planning to give school children …
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

[…] This is a relatively new theory that suggests that those who receive m-RNA based vaccines may “infect” those around them, even the non-vaccinated. If that is true the mask joke is on them. […]

Why do you even take any distinction between an alleged ( natural ) poison in the body …and one deliberately injected into the body, seriously !

Obviously IF it is accepted that the former’ exists ‘ and is, ” transmissible to others, purely by its alleged existence in the body, ” as ‘ the case ‘….
Then it follows that the latter must also be the case !by the same token ….. does it not ? …. Durrrr…..

And furthermore the latter, being a universally undisputed actual injected poison, MUST be transmissible through body fluids including sweat , as an already proven matter of fact ; by reason, that no one disputes its existence ! AND CANNOT POSSIBLY BE A MATTER FOR DISPUTE !

Joshua Witter

If one reads the actual Pfizer document the terms are defined. “Study intervention” refers to one of the 2 trial vaccines themselves. Therefore, risk to pregnant women “after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact” refers to actual contact with the vaccine itself (breathing it in or touching it), not contact with any vaccinated person. It is the same concept with the theoretical male family member, who is not a vaccinated individual, but rather someone who had themselves had an environmental/accidental exposure, and merely transmitted the vaccine material itself to the pregnant female.

While I believe there are many dangers associated with the vaccine, known and unknown, we must not misconstrue Pfizer’s published information, lest faulty arguments be exposed, leading only to our discredit.


The context of the report’s excerpts above do specify the type of contact quite clearly, i.e.occupational. You miss the point, which is that even the makers of this jab have reason to believe severe adverse effects ensue for expectant, new and nursing mothers. The question is: how do they come to have this belief, unless they know very well that one or more ingredients, or a combination of several, is already known to cause such ‘events’. Not that death by poison from a syringe is adequately described by the now ubiquitous term ‘event’.

Penny Fulton

Poppy, On the contrary, anyone injected with poisons, necessarily carries those poisons in every fluid and every cell of their body .
IE : The PERSON INJECTED : Becomes the living embodiment of the injected material .
There CAN BE NO possible distinction, post injection between the injected substance and the person injected .

Penny Fulton

You forget that ‘the vaccine itself ‘ is simply poisons inject into the blood stream, and therefor is thereafter ‘ (part and parcel of) ‘ the person themselves ‘ !
IE : The ‘vaccine’ itself , IS the person injected with it’s, blood, bodily fluids : eg : urine, saliva … in the droplets of moisture exhaled with every breath ! As well as in the sweat glands of the skin and the skin itself.

So thoroughly indoctrinated are we with the cult of illogical nonsense as ‘ medicine and science ‘ , that we even judge our criticism of it by the SAME illogical criteria, as ‘ a given ‘ !