Breaking News

For the Greater Good? – 1 premature baby death & 22 miscarriages reported as adverse reactions to the Covid Vaccines

MHRA data now shows that as a result of receiving a dose of either the Pfizer / BioNTech MRNA vaccine or the Oxford / Astrazeneca Viral Vector (still MRNA technology), a total of twenty-two women have now had to suffer the grief of having a miscarriage and losing their unborn child, and one woman has gone into premature labour in which the baby has tragically died.

Buy us a coffee!

Adverse reactions to both jabs reported to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme up to the 29th February shows an increase of two miscarriages on the previous week and means the number of women who have lost their baby as a result of receiving one of the Covid vaccines has now doubled in just two weeks. As of the 14th February 2021, a total of eleven women had lost their baby with three of those being due to the Oxford vaccine and eight of those being due to the Pfizer vaccine.

The MHRA Yellow Card data now shows that the Oxford jab has caused four women to sadly lose their unborn child, thankfully remaining unchanged since the 21st February.

However the Pfizer jab has now caused, as of the 29th February, a total of 18 women to sadly lose their unborn child, this is increase of 10 since the 14th February 2021.

However the MHRA data now also shows that the Pfizer jab has resulted in a single death due to a baby being born prematurely.

The Oxford vaccine has also caused 1 woman to go into premature labour and another to suffer premature rupture of membranes.

But why is this happening?

Well when the Pfizer jab was first approved for emergency use only in the United Kingdom, meaning the manufacturer is not liable for any harm or injury caused by their product, the Government’s advice was as follows –

There are no or limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2.
Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine
BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy

‘For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women
of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.

This was taken from a document released by the Government titled ‘REG 174 INFORMATION FOR UK HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS’, of which we reported to you back in December 2020.

Buy us a coffee!

However the Government has since updated it’s advice within the document, for reasons unknown to the following –

4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation
There is limited experience with use of the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in pregnant women.
Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy,
embryo/foetal development, parturition or post-natal development. Administration of
the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in pregnancy should only be considered when the potential
 outweigh any potential risks for the mother and foetus.

Statistically these women stood no chance of suffering from serious illness due to the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus and the alleged resulting disease Covid-19, now sadly they have to suffer the misery of losing their unborn children.

We urgently need your help!
Support for our Fundraiser has fallen

dramatically due to censorship by Google
and Social Media. If you like what we do
then please help us to keep doing it
by supporting us today…

Please choose your preferred donation method

Investigation – UK Gov. / SAGE document admits the Covid-19 Vaccines will lead to a variant that kills 35% of people because the jabs do not prevent infection or transmission
A document produced by the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies advising the …
Contract Approved to Use TOXIC Graphene Oxide for Water Treatment in UK – The Same Substance Found in Covid-19 Vaccines
G2O Water Technologies, a UK technology business, has managed to get its …
UK Government Bribing Young People to Get Covid Vaccine Through Free Pizza and Taxi Rides
The UK government is hoping that free food and taxi rides will …
Germany’s Largest Newspaper BILD Apologises for Harming Society Over its Coverage of the Covid-19 Pandemic
Germany's largest newspaper BILD has apologised for their coverage of the Covid-19 …
64% of all Covid-19 deaths since February were people who’d had the Covid-19 Injection
A Public Health England report shows that people who'd had the Covid-19 …
Midazolam was used to end the lives of thousands who you were told had died of Covid-19 & an NHS document proves Staff were ordered to do it
An official NHS document proves that NHS staff were told respiratory depressing …
It gets worse – UK Gov. / MHRA release 26th report on adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections
The UK Government have released their twenty-sixth report highlighting adverse reactions to …
FDA Asks More Children to Take Part in Covid Vaccine Trials
The FDA has asked Moderna and Pfizer to expand their Covid-19 trials …
Local Philippines Government Declares That Unvaccinated People Will Be Barred from Purchasing FOOD
Image source: FacebookThe executive order will introduce harsher Covid restrictions for the …
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Chris Williams

Subject to a Vitamin D blood level greater than 50ng/ml (50 nano-grams per millilitre), expert research studies suggest that thanks to our NATURAL IMMUNE SYSTEM most people would not be affected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus beyond very mild cold symptoms for 24-36 hours. (Our natural immune system, the product of 500Million years of evolution, relies for its operation on an adequate supply of blood circulating vitamin D).

Under 50ng/ml level, between 40-49 ng/ml, depending on level, the effect would likely be a cold, bad cold, or flu-like. Below 40ng/ml, depending on age, hospitalisation may be required. (It is a sad fact that a large proportion of the UK population has a level between 5ng/ml and 20ng/ml – the darker once’s skin the lower the level)

If hospitalised, as several trials in Spain have demonstrated, administration of the vitamin D metabolite, calcifediol, will within 2-4 hours, correct vitamin D deficiency and increases the blood level of Vitamin D to between 50-70ng/ml. Natural immunity can then swing into action; ICU will be most unlikely, and the hospital stay will be very short. Furthermore, calcifediol may be used in conjunction with other proven treatments such as: Ivermectin; or Hydroxychloroquine & zinc.
The above treatment protocols, are being used in many countries including in the USA.

The calcifediol treatment cost is less than €10 per patient. The other treatments mentioned are also extremely inexpensive as they are out of patent drugs.
Vitamin D supplementation at 4,000 IU per day (100 micrograms/day), so as to maintain a healthy NATURAL IMMUNE SYSTEM, is also inexpensive – around £15 for a year.

So, given the availability of perfectly safe alternative, proven treatments for COVID-19, it is a mystery why a tiny group of UK government scientists have misled our government into attempting to force upon the population experimental gene therapy treatments (that are being called vaccines but are not vaccines in the accepted sense). Furthermore, these “vaccines”, we are told, will not prevent one being infected or prevent one infecting someone else. But they will, we are told, reduce the severity of the illness……..?? Our NATURAL IMMUNE SYSTEM, subject to Vitamin D being available to it, does a much better job than that!

And once a healthy immune system has ‘met’ the virus, it will remember it and be able to deal with it, and its variants, in the future. The important thing is to have a sufficient vitamin D blood level for this unnaturally virulent virus.

George Addinall

I’ve read a lot about the covid scam, an awful lot, but am seriously impressed with the concise yet comprehensive coverage done here.
Well done.
“I was so impressed, I bought the company ” Victor Kiam 😀
Well maybe not bought the company but have set up a small monthly payment to show my appreciation